Tuesday, April 10, 2018

The First Penny




They called him Colonel Galloway. That’s odd, because during the War Between the States he was General Nathan Bedford Forrest’s Aide-de-camp, and I’m not certain his position carried a rank in the Confederate Army.  I can’t prove it, but I suspect he held the rank of Colonel in one of Memphis’s home guard militias (Memphis Minute Men perhaps) that was formed between 1857, when he arrived in Memphis, and late June of 1862 when he left Memphis to fight the Union invaders on other fronts.

Before and after the war, Galloway was the editor and part owner of the Avalanche, a staunch Democrat newspaper that never backed down from defending the cause of the South long after the war was over.

By mid June of 1862, Federal authorities in Memphis had suspended the Avalanche and Galloway was in Grenada, MS. His wife, Fannie Barker Galloway stayed behind in their house on the northeast corner of Court and Third.

Like another notable Confederate Memphis wife, Mrs. Elizabeth Avery Meriwether, Mrs. Galloway was expelled from Memphis by the Union occupiers. Mrs. Meriwether would be exiled by General Sherman in response to guerrilla activity in and around West Tennessee. Mrs. Galloway, who was suspected of passing information to the Confederates, was forced to leave days before Grant issued his infamous Special Order No. 14 (later revised and reissued as Special Order No. 15). 



Galloway revived the Avalanche by New Year’s Day of 1866 in a Memphis that remained under Federal occupation and was overrun not only by black soldiers, carpetbaggers, and abolitionist teachers, but by thousands of formerly enslaved people who mostly occupied South Memphis, Presidents Island, and Fort Pickering (the area south of the Overton Tract and the Mississippi and Tennessee Rail Road depot.

If that wasn’t bad enough, the city itself was in the hands of Irish Fenians who apparently ran roughshod over a drunken mayor, and most of the old citizens had been disfranchised as a consequence of their loyalties.

Five months later, the day the last black soldiers in Memphis were mustered out of the Union Army (and thus disarmed), the Irish cops instigated a three day massacre that targeted blacks who were beginning to enjoy a measure of economic success and making remarkable advances in their children’s education.

The role Galloway and the Avalanche played in the atrocities can’t be ignored. It was the Avalanche that laid the blame for the atrocities squarely on the heads of the blacks themselves. When we consider that the investigations revealed that aforementioned abolitionist teachers were on the mobs' (plural) hit lists, it’s more than a little odd that the the Avalanche's call for restraint marked the end of the violence.


In the course of the (politically motivated) investigations that followed, it was made clear by the “old citizens” that they deplored the actions of the low born Irish, but that they were rendered helpless by order of General Stoneman. What is missing from their denouncements is any effort or expression of desire to hold the guilty parties accountable after the fact. Worse was the lack of aid to help South Memphis recover from the losses.

The massacre of 1866 was followed by the appearance of the KKK in Memphis in 1867.

In Chapter XXIV of her memoir, Recollections, Elizabeth Avery Meriwether herself rationalizes the atrocities committed by the KKK (her husband, Minor, was one of “Supreme Grand Wizard” Forrest’s counselors and lieutenants), and reveals how Galloway played a role in obscuring the mere existence of the outlaw organization.

Fast forward ten years.

General Nathan Bedford Forrest died on the twenty-ninth of October, 1877 and the funerary rites that followed were the topic of National news. The local papers that reported on the proceedings read like a who’s who of Memphis and the Mid South, unless you count the absence of the Independent Order of Pole Bearers or any other notable black people.

The year after that, 1878, yellow fever made its annual appearance in Memphis, and it wouldn’t leave until October because it was accompanied by the warm mosquito friendly winds of El NiƱo. The old citizens (with notable exceptions, the Mayor for example) fled the city, and for the first time in our History, Memphis had a black majority. Who is going to say they didn’t protect and indeed rescue Memphis that year?

Of course, the white families who returned to Memphis properly thanked them, and then proceeded to send them back to South Memphis.

I would say that things went back to business as usual, but 1878 was two years after Hayes-Tilden, one year after the death of Gen N B Forrest, and less than a year before Memphis surrendered her charter.

Eighteen seventy nine was a significant year for our purposes because that was the year that M C Galloway donated the very first penny for the Forrest monument.


Let’s be careful about how we throw the “white supremacist” label around, but it is clear that M C Galloway did believe that white supremacy was a natural, if not God ordained, fact of life (I suspect a number of black people believed it as well).

It would be twenty six years before the monument was installed, and Memphis's attitude of white supremacy hardly changed for the better, what with lynch law, the pattern of bartering for and coercing black votes, and the ascendancy of a very young E H Crump that marked the turning of the century.

More specific to the funding of the statue, I have to wonder why Bob Church’s support is never mentioned.

You can object to my assertions on the grounds that we are in no way accountable for the sins of the father, but how can we deny that the noble symbolism of this particular monument is forever tainted by an image that was considered appropriate matter for a city newspaper?


One last question: How can Memphis be expected to embrace her Confederate Heritage, if we can’t bring ourselves to own our History?

Peace Y’all

A Peace Offering


What Happened

I really put my foot in it, the day before April 4, 2018. The Hell of the whole situation is that the “it” I put my foot in was my own crap, and I did it because I violated the standards I believe Memphis is beginning to remember.

Here's the link to the Facebook thread that brought me to this point.

Basically, I threw out a juicy morsel of Confederate statue bait and Christopher Rice set the hook.



Christopher was right; while my assertion was based on evidence I personally gathered from sources that include the microfilm files at Benjamin Hooks Library and the Chronicling America website, my statement was not backed up with readily available facts. Then there’s the further fact that while I claimed I intended no insult toward anyone’s family, my entire approach (“imagined History” was a cheap shot) is insulting.  And I call myself a teacher…

From where things stood on the third, it appeared I had two Facebook expected choices. I could have stepped up my “game” and turned an opportunity for constructive conversation into a self defeating data-dump sideshow. The other choice was to tuck tail and slink away.

I chose neither.

Sincerely:

I apologize to all Confederate Memphians. I have been painting you in with the alt-right version of white supremacy and that was nothing but mean. There can be no Memphis without you.

I apologize to Christopher. Thank you for your regard for your fellows and for stepping up to the bully.

Most importantly, I apologize to you, Memphis. I broke a rule Jesus doesn’t want us breaking, and I let you down.

Tactical Retreat

You probably didn’t notice, but I haven’t made my Face Book rounds since then. If it matters to you at all, my absence is part of what I hope is a constructive act of penance I set for myself when I found my own words wrapped around my ankles. 

I basically demoted my statement to a theory, and banned myself from Face Book until I:

  • Reexamined my own motives

  • Found the first penny

  • Produced a composition appropriate to the conversation (I have since upped that to two, this first one being the second one assigned).

Where I Stand

Make no mistake: I’m still convinced that removing the statues was the right thing to do because of the message (intended or otherwise) they send, and the oppression they engender.

That being said, I don’t believe that this should mark the latest victory in an ongoing effort to rewrite Memphis History with a gigantic eraser. I do believe that the statue's removal can, at least in Memphis, be turned into an opportunity for constructive conversation that honestly reassesses and even embraces our shared History. When I say honestly, I mean it in the uncomfortable often painful sense of the word.

Look at it this way, without  getting into the technicalities of what defines a funerary monument just this minute, there is still the question of what is to become of the graves of General and Mrs. Forrest. Who's looking forward to that conversation? I’ll just ask y'all this: Are we going to gear up for another season of reality show news featuring the Alt-Right White Boys vs the Antifa Snowflakes, or are we going to continue to keep family (however dysfunctional) business in the family?

Who’s going to define Memphis? Fox CNN and the social media news-trolls who are bent on division, or a more mature Memphis bent on reconciliation?

Peace Y’all

Now, about that First Penny



Sunday, April 1, 2018

Justice Begins With Mercy


Jesus, on Mercy:

Matt 9:27,29&30a
27 As Jesus went on from there, two blind men followed Him, crying out, "Have mercy on us, Son of David!”
29 Then He touched their eyes, saying, "It shall be done to you according to your faith." 
30 And their eyes were opened. NASU

Matt 17:15,18
15 Lord, have mercy on my son, for he is a lunatic and is very ill; for he often falls into the fire and often into the water.
 18 And Jesus rebuked him, and the demon came out of him, and the boy was cured at once.
NASU

This next one is one of my favorites:

Matt 15:22-28
22 And a Canaanite woman from that region came out and began to cry out, saying, "Have mercy on me, Lord, Son of David; my daughter is cruelly demon-possessed." 23 But He did not answer her a word. And His disciples came and implored Him, saying, "Send her away, because she keeps shouting at us." 24 But He answered and said, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel."  25 But she came and began to bow down before Him, saying, "Lord, help me!" 26 And He answered and said, "It is not good to take the children's bread and throw it to the dogs."  27 But she said, "Yes, Lord; but even the dogs feed on the crumbs which fall from their masters' table." 28 Then Jesus said to her, "O woman, your faith is great; it shall be done for you as you wish." And her daughter was healed at once.
NASU

This is Easter…Resurrection Sunday…Rites of Spring…another day, except that it’s the day, this year, on which most of us are remembering what took place on that particular first day of the week; the manifestation of God’s Mercy working to satisfy the Justice that Judgment demands.

Here’s a half-rhetorical question for you:

Does Jesus have the relationship between Mercy Judgment and Justice in the wrong order? 

Don't we behave as if Mercy, if there is to be any, is supposed to come some time between Judgment and Justice? 

Isn't that the time when the convict is supposed to throw himself on the "mercy" of the court?

Jesus shows mercy to people whose pain had nothing to do with anything he did, or any kind of divine retribution inflicted by God. There is no question of guilt, no question of future punishment. The only question is: Why come to him in search of mercy?

The answer is not just that they knew he could bestow whatever mercy they were seeking, but that they knew he would.

It looks to me like Jesus believes that: 

Justice begins with Mercy

before Judgment is even an issue.

I'm not going to argue with him, because well, I believe him, but just in case you do need a little fear-of-God put it you, here’s what James says:

James 2:8-13
8 If, however, you are fulfilling the royal law according to the Scripture, "YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF," you are doing well. 9 But if you show partiality, you are committing sin and are convicted by the law as transgressors. 10 For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles in one point, he has become guilty of all. 11 For He who said, "DO NOT COMMIT ADULTERY," also said, "DO NOT COMMIT MURDER." Now if you do not commit adultery, but do commit murder, you have become a transgressor of the law. 12 So speak and so act as those who are to be judged by the law of liberty. 13 For judgment will be merciless to one who has shown no mercy; mercy triumphs over judgment.
NASU

  • But if you show partiality, you are committing sin and are convicted by the law as transgressors.
  • For judgment will be merciless to one who has shown no mercy; mercy triumphs over judgment.


In a nutshell, James is saying that if you want to insist on the rule of law, you should know that the law has to be your advocate. If, however you choose to live by the royal law, Mercy will be your advocate at the throne of Judgment (pssst...that's the big One that Jesus sits next to).

Here's an example we might want to follow:



 Have Mercy. Say his name then have some more.

Stephon Clark


Peace Y'all